EV Charging & Consignment Management

EV Charging & Consignment Management

ROLE

Senior UI/UX Designer

SCOPE

Defining Scope, IA, Client Communication

INDUSTRY

Electric Mobility & Logistics

TIMELINE

3 Weeks

A concept app that manages the complete truck journey, from trip initiation and gate-out to charging stops, delivery and gate-in, with connected workflows for drivers, fleet operators and stakeholders.

Mobile App
Client App
Admin Dashboard

1 ecosystem. 3 touchpoints.

A long haul electric truck is moving, but the driver, the fleet admin and the stakeholder each see a different slice of the trip.

I designed three touchpoints to manage the logistics journey.

Problem Statement

A truck is moving. But does everyone know what's happening?

A truck is moving. But does everyone know what's happening?

When a consignment travels across long distances, drivers, fleet operators, and logistics teams need visibility into different stages of the journey.

Fleet teams couldn’t answer three basic questions mid trip: where is the truck, where will it charge, and what proof do we have of what happened. Each question became a design requirement.

Client's Concers

Problem derived from it

“Where exactly is my truck, and how is the trip progressing?”

Limited trip visibility

“Where can the driver charge along the route?”

Charging information isn't sufficiently integrated into the journey

“How do we know what happened during the trip?”

Trip records are captured across multiple stages and need to be connected

“How can everyone stay updated?”

Information needs to be shared across drivers, fleet administrators, and consignment stakeholders

Competitive Analysis

-

Logistics

→ Similar logistics platforms existed, but access was unavailable.


→ Designed the experience from scratch using client requirements, and operational assumptions.

EV Charging

→ Reviewed Jio-bp, Tata Power EZ Charge, Statiq and Bolt.Earth.

→ Studied station discovery, map interfaces and charging workflows to define Haulo's charging experience.

Defining the Scope

The initial brief didn't come with a detailed feature list. I translated the key operational concerns into a set of product requirements, mapping what each user needed to do across the admin panel, driver app, and stakeholder portal.

Driver's User Flow

The driver journey was structured around the complete trip lifecycle, covering trip initiation, vehicle verification, route navigation, charging stops and trip closure.

Flow Decision

Does the workflow apply only when a truck carries a consignment, or does it also apply to an empty return journey?

The clarification

The same core trip workflow applies regardless of whether the truck is carrying a consignment or travelling empty.

Loaded trip

Trip setup → Vehicle checks → Route & charging → Delivery documents → Trip closure

Empty return

Trip setup → Vehicle checks → Route & charging → Journey completion

App Screens

Each screen addresses a specific operational requirement, with a focus on simplifying driver interactions, reducing manual effort and maintaining visibility across the journey.

Onboarding & Home

Onboarding → Login with mobile + OTP → Home

Gate Out

Added real-time dashboard image uploads to maintain transparency and document the vehicle's initial condition.

Select Route → Truck → Trailer → Upload Dashboard → Verify Dashboard Details → Enter Weight → Start trip

During Trip

Trip Started → Follow Route → Check Charging Stations

Key Decision: In-app Navigation

→ Integrated the map within Haulo instead of redirecting drivers to Google Maps.

→ Kept route information and trip-related details accessible in one interface.

→ Aligned the approach with PMs and developers to maintain a connected workflow.

Gate In

Trip Ended → Upload Dashboard → Verify Deails → Upload Contract/Invoice → End Trip

Charging Stations

Find Charging Station on Map → Upload Dashboard before Plug In → Upload Dashboard after Plug Out → Continue Trip

Help & Profile

Driver Deatils → Trip Details → Contact Details

Usability Test

The prototype was tested with 4 employees from the client's team to evaluate how easily they could navigate the trip workflow.

What we observed

2 of 4 participant completed the flow independently.

1 participant required considerable guidance to complete the flow.

1 participant reported limited comfort with English, highlighting a potential accessibility barrier.

2 of 4 participant completed the flow independently.

1 participant required considerable guidance to complete the flow.

1 participant reported limited comfort with English, highlighting a potential accessibility barrier.

Key learnings

Improve independent task completion: Simplify steps where users needed guidance.

Reduce friction: Address the minor usability issues identified during testing.

Make the experience more accessible: Explore Hindi and additional language options to support drivers with different language preferences.

Create a free website with Framer, the website builder loved by startups, designers and agencies.